Figure 1.9 a a b b a--b u u a--u v v a--v c c b--c b--v b--v w w c--w c--v u--v

Question 1.3.1
(i) Find the degree of each vertex in GG of Figure 1.9.
(ii) Find N(x)N(x) for each vertex xx in GG of Figure 1.9.
(iii) By definition, is it true that d(v)=N(v)d(v) = |N(v)|?

Solution
(i)

d(a)=3d(b)=4d(c)=3d(u)=2d(v)=5d(w)=1d(a) = 3 \\ d(b) = 4 \\ d(c) = 3 \\ d(u) = 2 \\ d(v) = 5 \\ d(w) = 1

(ii)

N(a)={u,v,b}N(b)={a,v,c}N(c)={b,v,w}N(u)={a,v}N(v)={a,b,c,u}N(w)={c}N(a) = \{u, v, b\} \\ N(b) = \{a, v, c\} \\ N(c) = \{b, v, w\} \\ N(u) = \{a, v\} \\ N(v) = \{a, b, c, u\} \\ N(w) = \{c\}

(iii) It is not always true that d(v)=N(v)d(v) = |N(v)|. For example d(v)=5d(v) = 5 but N(v)=4|N(v)| = 4. This happens because of multiple edges- there are two bvbv edges but because sets don't allow duplications N(v)N(v) only contains bb once.


Question 1.3.2   Consider the multigraph GG of Figure 1.9. Find e(G)e(G) and the sum of the degrees of the six vertices. Is the sum twice of e(G)e(G)?
    In general, is the sum of the degrees of the vertices in a multigraph always double its size?

Solution
To find e(G)e(G) simply label the edges

Figure 1.9 a a b b a--b 3 u u a--u 1 v v a--v 2 c c b--c 6 b--v 4 b--v 5 w w c--w 8 c--v 7 u--v 9

So clearly e(G)=9e(G) = 9. Next we find the sum of the degrees of the six vertices.

vV(G)d(v)=d(a)+d(b)+d(c)+d(u)+d(v)+d(w)=3+4+3+2+5+1=18\begin{aligned} \sum_{v \in V(G)} d(v) &= d(a) + d(b) + d(c) + d(u) + d(v) + d(w) \\ &= 3 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 5 + 1 = 18 \end{aligned}

Here we have vV(G)d(v)=2e(G)\sum_{v \in V(G)} d(v) = 2 e(G) and by the Handshaking Lemma this holds in general.


Figure 1.10 j j p p a a x x a--x z z b b b--x c c b--c y y y--z x--z x--y c--y c--x w w w--z w--y w--x w--x

Question 1.3.3     (1) How many odd vertices are there in each of the multigraphs in the previous examples?
(2) Can you construct a multigraph containing
    (i) exactly one odd vertex?
    (ii) exactly three odd vertices?

Solution

(1) First let's take a look at Figure 1.10 and plot the vertices and their respective degrees:

Vertex Degree
aa 1
bb 2
cc 3
jj 0
pp 0
ww 4
xx 7
yy 4
zz 3

We can see from this table that four vertices, aa, cc, xx, and zz, have odd degree.

Next let's take a look at Figure 1.9, pictured again here

Figure 1.9 a a b b a--b u u a--u v v a--v c c b--c b--v b--v w w c--w c--v u--v

Let's make a table of the vertices and their degrees

Vertex Degree
aa 3
bb 4
cc 3
uu 2
vv 5
ww 1

We can see from this table that four vertices, aa, cc, vv, and ww, have odd degree.

(2) No for both (i) and (ii) because one and three are odd numbers, and you must have an even number of vertices with odd degree.


Question 1.3.4.     Construct a 55-regular graph of order 1010. What is its size?

Solution

1 1 2 2 6 6 1--6 7 7 1--7 8 8 1--8 9 9 1--9 10 10 1--10 3 3 2--6 2--7 2--8 2--9 2--10 4 4 3--6 3--7 3--8 3--9 3--10 5 5 4--6 4--7 4--8 4--9 4--10 5--6 5--7 5--8 5--9 5--10

Of course its size is 5050 because it has 1010 nodes each of which is incident with 55 edges.


Among the (simple) graphs GG of a fixed order nn, at one extreme, the null graph NnN_n contains no edges (the least possible size). At the other extreme, we may ask:

Question 1.3.5.     What is the largest possible size that GG can have? Which graph has its size attaining this largest possible number?

Solution

The largest possible size that GG can have is n+(n1)++0=n(n1)2n + (n-1) + \cdot + 0 = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}, which happens when each vertex is adjacent to every other vertex.


Exercise 1.3

(1)(1) \> In the following multigraph GG, find
(i)\quad (i) \> the size of GG,
(ii)\quad (ii) \> the degree of each vertex,
(iii)\quad (iii) \> the sum {d(v)vV(G)}\sum \{ d(v) | v \in V(G) \},
(iv)\quad (iv) \> the number of odd vertices,
(v)\quad (v) \> Δ(G)\Delta(G), and
(vi)\quad (vi) \> δ(G)\delta(G).

a a e e a--e b b a--b c c a--c a--c x x a--x g g e--g y y e--y z z e--z g--y b--e w w b--c c--e c--y

Is your answer for (iii)(iii) double your answer for (i)(i)? Is your answer for (iv)(iv) an even number?

Solution

(i)(i) \> To find the size of GG we count all the edges

a a e e a--e 5 b b a--b 1 c c a--c 2 a--c 3 x x a--x 4 g g e--g 12 y y e--y 10 z z e--z 11 g--y 13 b--e 6 w w b--c 7 c--e 8 c--y 9

Clearly e(G)=13e(G) = 13.

(ii)(ii) \> Let's make a table to see the degree of each vertex

Vertex Degree
aa 5
bb 3
cc 5
ee 6
gg 2
ww 0
xx 1
yy 3
zz 1

(iii)(iii) \> Simply add the degree column to get the sum of the degrees

5+3+5+6+2+0+1+3+1=265 + 3 + 5 + 6 + 2 + 0 + 1 + 3 + 1 = 26

(iv)(iv) \> The odd vertices are aa, bb, cc, xx, yy, zz, so there are 66 odd vertices.

(v)(v) \> The highest degree vertex is ee with a degree of 66 so Δ(G)=6\Delta(G) = 6.

(vi)(vi) \> The lowest degree vertex is ww with a degree of 00 so δ(G)=0\delta(G) = 0.

The answer to (iii)(iii) is double the answer of (i)(i) and the answer for (iv)(iv) is an even number.


(2)(2) \> Construct a multigraph of order 66 and size 77 in which every vertex is odd.

Solution

1 1 2 2 4 4 1--4 1--4 1--4 3 3 5 5 2--5 2--5 2--5 6 6 3--6


(3)(3) \> Let GG be a multigraph with V(G)={v1,v2,,vn}V(G) = \{v_1, v_2, \cdots, v_n\}. Prove that the sum of all the entries in the iith row of the adjacency matrix A(G)A(G) is the degree of the vertex viv_i for each i=1,2,,ni = 1, 2, \cdots, n.

Solution

j=1nai,j=j=1n# edges joining vi and vj=d(vi)\sum_{j=1}^n a_{i,j} = \sum_{j=1}^n \text{\# edges joining } v_i \text{ and } v_j = d(v_i)


(4)(4) \> Let GG be a graph of order 88 and size 1515 in which each vertex is of degree 33 or 55. How many vertices of degree 55 does GG have? Construct one such graph GG.

Solution
Here is one such graph

1 1 2 2 1--2 4 4 1--4 1--4 6 6 1--6 8 8 1--8 3 3 2--3 2--6 3--4 3--6 5 5 4--5 7 7 4--7 5--6 5--8 6--7 7--8

We can check that it is size 1515 by counting the edges

1 1 2 2 1--2 1 4 4 1--4 2 1--4 3 6 6 1--6 4 8 8 1--8 5 3 3 2--3 6 2--6 7 3--4 8 3--6 9 5 5 4--5 10 7 7 4--7 11 5--6 12 5--8 13 6--7 14 7--8 15

or by observing that the adjacency matrix is

A(G)=(0102010110100100010101002010101000010101111010100001010110001010)A(G) = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 & 2 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 2 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix}

And so the sum of each row / column is

r1=1+2+1+1=5r2=1+1+1=3r3=1+1+1=3r4=2+1+1+1=5r5=1+1+1=3r6=1+1+1+1+1=5r7=1+1+1=3r8=1+1+1=3r_1 = 1 + 2 + 1 + 1 = 5 \\ r_2 = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 \\ r_3 = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 \\ r_4 = 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 5 \\ r_5 = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 \\ r_6 = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 5 \\ r_7 = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 \\ r_8 = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3

(note that this shows that the degree of each vertex is either 33 or 55 as desired)

We can add these up to get

r1+r2+r3+r4+r5+r6+r7+r8=5+3+3+5+3+5+3+3=30r_1 + r_2 + r_3 + r_4 + r_5 + r_6 + r_7 + r_8 = 5 + 3 + 3 + 5 + 3 + 5 + 3 + 3 = 30

This must be double the number of edges, so we conclude that e(G)=15e(G) = 15.

Finally, since r1r_1, r4r_4, and r6r_6 sum up to 5, vertices 11, 44, and 66 have degree five, so our GG has 33 vertices of degree five.

Now, why must all graphs GG have 33 vertices of degree five? Well know that GG is of order 88 and size 1515 so by the Handshaking Lemma

i=18d(vi)=2×15=30\sum_{i=1}^8 d(v_i) = 2 \times 15 = 30

We also know that each vertex is degree 33 or 55. Let AA be the set of vertices of degree 33 and BB be the set of vertices with degree 55. Then

30=vAd(v)+vBd(v)=3A+5B30 = \sum_{v \in A} d(v) + \sum_{v \in B} d(v) = 3 |A| + 5 |B|

Of course since we are order 88 and every vertex is in AA or BB but not both so V(G)=ABV(G) = A \sqcup B, that is the union is disjoint so

A+B=8|A| + |B| = 8

Plugging in,

30=3A+5(8A)=402AA=5B=8A=3.30 = 3|A| + 5 (8 - |A|) = 40 - 2 |A| \\ |A| = 5 \\ |B| = 8 - |A| = 3. \quad \square


(5)(5) \> Let HH be a graph of order 1010 such that 3d(v)53 \leq d(v) \leq 5 for each vertex vv in HH. Not every vertex is even. No two odd vertices are of the same degree. What is the size of HH?

Solution
By the Handshaking Lemma we have

vV(H)d(v)=2e(H)\sum_{v \in V(H)} d(v) = 2 e(H)

It would be impossible to have one vertex be degree 33 and the rest be even because then we would have

2e(H)=3+9×4=392e(H) = 3 + 9 \times 4 = 39

Similarly, it would be impossible to have one vertex be degree 55 and the rest be even because then we would have

2e(H)=5+9×4=412e(H) = 5 + 9 \times 4 = 41

We conclude that we must have on degree 33 vertex, one degree 55 vertex, and that the rest are even. So we calculate that

2e(H)=3+5+8×4=40e(H)=20.2 e(H) = 3 + 5 + 8 \times 4 = 40 \\ e(H) = 20. \quad \square


(6)(6) \> Let GG be a graph of order 1414 and size 3030 in which every vertex is of degree 44 or 55. How many vertices of degree 55 does GG have? Construct one such graph GG.

Solution
Let AA be the set of vertices that are degree 55. By the Handshaking Lemma,

2×30=vAd(v)+vAd(v)=5×A+4×(14A)=56+AA=4.\begin{aligned} 2 \times 30 &= \sum_{v \in A} d(v) + \sum_{v \notin A} d(v) = 5 \times |A| + 4 \times (14 - |A|) \\ &= 56 + |A| \end{aligned} \\ |A| = 4. \quad \square

Here is one such graph

1 1 2 2 5 5 1--5 6 6 1--6 7 7 1--7 8 8 1--8 9 9 1--9 3 3 2--5 2--6 2--7 2--8 2--9 4 4 3--5 3--6 3--7 3--8 3--9 4--5 4--6 4--7 4--8 4--9 10 10 11 11 10--11 12 12 10--12 13 13 10--13 14 14 10--14 11--12 11--13 11--14 12--13 12--14 13--14

Let's check the degrees of each vertex

Vertex Degree
11 5
22 5
33 5
44 5
55 4
66 4
77 4
88 4
99 4
1010 4
1111 4
1212 4
1313 4
1414 4

Clearly exactly four vertices are degree 55 and the rest are degree 44, and the sum of their degree is 6060, so we know that the size of GG is 3030.


(7)(7) \> Does there exist a multigraph GG of order 88 such that δ(G)=0\delta(G) = 0 while Δ(G)=7\Delta(G) = 7? What if "multigraph GG" is replaced by "graph GG"?

Solution
Here is one such multigraph GG:

1 1 2 2 3 3 2--3 2--3 4 4 2--4 5 5 2--5 6 6 2--6 7 7 2--7 8 8 2--8

However, no such simple graph can exist. As you can see we need the double edge connection 22 and 33 to get the vertex count up to 77. There are only 88 total vertices, so if one vertex connects to every other vertex that would be 77 connections, but it must not connect to one of the vertices because one of the vertices must have degree 00 because δ(G)=0\delta(G) = 0. \quad \square


(8)(8) \> Characterize the 1-regular graphs.

Solution

The 1-regular graphs are graphs GG such that for every vertex vV(G)v \in V(G) we have d(v)=1d(v) = 1. By the Handshaking Lemma,

vV(G)d(v)=2e(G)\sum_{v \in V(G)} d(v) = 2e(G)

Since d(v)=1d(v) = 1 we can simplify this to

2e(G)=v(G)2e(G) = v(G)

So all 1-regular graphs have an even number of vertices, and have an edge for every two vertices. Here are some examples of 1-regular graphs.

1 1 2 2 1--2

(2 vertices and 1 edge)

1 1 2 2 1--2 3 3 4 4 3--4

(4 vertices and 2 edges)

1 1 2 2 1--2 3 3 4 4 3--4 5 5 6 6 5--6

(6 vertices and 3 edges)
etc...


(9)(9) \> Draw all regular graphs of order nn, where 2n62 \leq n \leq 6.

Solution

When n=2n = 2 there are two:

a zero-regular:

1 1 2 2

and a 11-regular:

1 1 2 2 1--2

When n=3n = 3 are two:

a zero-regular:

1 1 2 2 3 3

and a 22-regular:

1 1 2 2 1--2 3 3 2--3 3--1

When n=4n = 4 there are three:

a zero-regular:

1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4

a 11-regular:

1 1 2 2 1--2 3 3 4 4 3--4

and a 22-regular:

1 1 2 2 1--2 3 3 2--3 4 4 4--1 4--3

When n=5n = 5 there are two:

a zero-regular:

1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5

and a 22-regular:

1 1 2 2 1--2 5 5 1--5 3 3 2--3 4 4 4--5 4--3

Finally, when n=6n = 6 there are four:

a zero-regular:

1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6

a 11-regular:

1 1 2 2 1--2 3 3 4 4 3--4 5 5 6 6 5--6

a 22-regular:

1 1 2 2 1--2 3 3 2--3 4 4 3--4 6 6 6--1 5 5 5--6 5--4

and a 33-regular:

1 1 4 4 1--4 5 5 1--5 6 6 1--6 2 2 2--4 2--5 2--6 3 3 3--4 3--5 3--6


(10)(i)(10) \> (i) \> Does there exist a graph GG of order 55 such that δ(G)=1\delta(G) = 1 and Δ(G)=4\Delta(G) = 4?
(ii)\quad \quad (ii) \> Does there exist a graph GG of order 55 which has two vertices of degree 44 and δ(G)=1\delta(G) = 1?

Solution

(i)(i) \> Yes, as this graph GG is order 55 such that δ(G)=1\delta(G) = 1 and Δ(G)=4\Delta(G) = 4:

1 1 2 2 1--2 3 3 1--3 4 4 1--4 5 5 1--5

(ii)(ii) No such graph GG of order 55 which has two vertices of degree 44 and δ(G)=1\delta(G) = 1 exists.

Assume such a graph GG did exist. Label the two vertices of degree 44 as 11 and 22. It is sufficient to prove that

d(n)2 for n=3,4,5d(n) \geq 2 \text{ for } n = 3, 4, 5

Let n=3,4,5n = 3, 4, 5. It is sufficient to prove that the edges {1,n}\{1, n\} and {2,n}\{2, n\} exist.

Assume that {1,n}E(G)\{1, n\} \notin E(G). Then d(1)3d(1) \leq 3 (because there are 55 total vertices, and 11 can't be connected to itself or nn), contradicting d(1)=4d(1) = 4. Therefore, {1,n}E(G)\{1, n\} \in E(G). We similarly have {2,n}E(G)\{2, n\} \in E(G). \quad \square


(11)(11) \> Let HH be a graph of order 88 and size 1313 with δ(H)=2\delta(H) = 2 and Δ(H)=4\Delta(H) = 4. Denote by nin_i the number of vertices in HH of degree ii, where i=2,3,4i = 2,3,4. Assume that n31n_3 \geq 1. Find all possible answers for (n2,n3,n4)(n_2, n_3, n_4). For each of your answers, construct a corresponding graph.

Solution
Let AA be the set of vertices degree 22, BB be the set of vertices degree 33, and CC be the set of vertices degree 44. Since there are 88 total vertices and for each vertex vv the inequality δ(H)d(v)Δ(H)\delta(H) \leq d(v) \leq \Delta(H) holds, we plug in to get 2d(v)42 \leq d(v) \leq 4, or equivalently each vertex vv is in AA, BB, or CC. Therefore,

A+B+C=8.(1)\tag{1} |A| + |B| + |C| = 8.

Applying the Handshaking Lemma gives

vV(H)d(v)=2e(H)vAd(v)+vBd(v)+vCd(v)=2×132A+3B+4C=26\begin{align*} \sum_{v \in V(H)} d(v) &= 2 e(H) \\ \sum_{v \in A} d(v) + \sum_{v \in B} d(v) + \sum_{v \in C} d(v) &= 2 \times 13 \\ \tag{2} 2|A| + 3|B| + 4|C| &= 26 \\ \end{align*}

Subtracting (1)(1) twice from (2)(2) yields

B+2C=10|B| + 2|C| = 10

since δ(H)=2\delta(H) = 2, Δ(H)=4\Delta(H) = 4, and n31n_3 \geq 1

6A,B,C,1.6 \geq |A|, |B|, |C|, \geq 1.

So the preliminary pairs of B|B| and C|C| are:

This leaves us with the possibilities

Or in the form (n2,n3,n4)(n_2, n_3, n_4) our possibilities are (2,2,4)(2, 2, 4) and (1,4,3)(1, 4, 3). \quad \square
The following graph is an example of the former.

1 1 2 2 1--2 1 3 3 1--3 2 4 4 1--4 3 5 5 1--5 4 2--3 5 8 8 2--8 8 3--4 6 3--8 9 4--5 7 6 6 5--6 11 5--8 10 7 7 6--7 12 7--8 13

Vertex Degree
1 4
2 3
3 4
4 3
5 4
6 2
7 2
8 4

And the following graph is an example of the latter.

1 1 2 2 1--2 1 3 3 1--3 2 7 7 1--7 3 2--3 4 4 4 2--4 5 5 5 2--5 6 3--4 7 3--5 8 4--5 9 6 6 5--6 10 6--7 11 8 8 6--8 12 7--8 13

Vertex Degree
1 3
2 4
3 4
4 3
5 4
6 3
7 3
8 2

(12)(12) \> Suppose GG is a kk-regular graph of order nn and size mm, where k0k \geq 0, m0m \geq 0 and n1n \geq 1. Find a relation linking k,nk, n and mm. Justify your answer.

Solution

Since GG is kk-regular

d(v)=kfor vV(G)d(v) = k \quad \text{for } v \in V(G)

Since GG is order nn

v(G)=V(G)=nv(G) = |V(G)| = n

Since GG is size mm

e(G)=E(G)=me(G) = |E(G)| = m

By the Handshaking Lemma

vV(G)d(v)=2e(G)\sum_{v \in V(G)} d(v) = 2e(G)

Plugging in

vV(G)k=2mnk=2m.\sum_{v \in V(G)} k = 2m \\ nk = 2m. \quad \square


(13)(13) \> Does there exist a 33-regular graph with eight vertices? Does there exist a 33-regular graph with nine vertices?

Solution

One does exist for eight vertices

1 1 4 4 1--4 5 5 1--5 6 6 1--6 7 7 4--7 8 8 4--8 2 2 2--5 2--6 2--7 7--8 3 3 3--5 3--6 3--8

However one does not exist for nine vertices. From (12)(12) we know that

nk=2mnk = 2m

Where nn is the order, and mm is the size. Plugging in for a k=3k=3-regular graph with n=9n=9 vertices,

9×3=2m9 \times 3 = 2m

Which can not be true for any integer mm, contradicting the existence of a 33-regular graph with 99 vertices. \quad \square


(14)(14) \> Construct a cubic graph of order 1212. What is its size? Does there exist a cubic graph of order 1111? Why?

Solution

Here is a cubic graph of order 1212

1 1 7 7 1--7 8 8 1--8 9 9 1--9 2 2 2--7 2--8 2--9 3 3 3--7 3--8 3--9 4 4 10 10 4--10 11 11 4--11 12 12 4--12 5 5 5--10 5--11 5--12 6 6 6--10 6--11 6--12

You can use the formula from (12)(12) to calculate its size

m=nk2=12×32=18m = \frac{nk}{2} = \frac{12 \times 3}{2} = 18

(or you can just count)

1 1 2 2 7 7 1--7 1 8 8 1--8 2 9 9 1--9 3 3 3 2--7 4 2--8 5 2--9 6 3--7 7 3--8 8 3--9 9 4 4 5 5 10 10 4--10 10 11 11 4--11 11 12 12 4--12 12 6 6 5--10 13 5--11 14 5--12 15 6--10 16 6--11 17 6--12 18

There is no cubic graph of order 1111. To prove it, first assume such a graph did exist. Then

nk=2m11×3=2mnk = 2m \\ 11 \times 3 = 2m

Which is a contradiction. \quad \square


(15)(15) \> Let HH be a kk-regular graph of order nn. If e(H)=10e(H) = 10, find all possible values for kk and nn; and for each case, construct one such graph HH.

Solution

Let's start with

nk=2mnk = 2m

Plugging in m=e(H)=10m = e(H) = 10

nk=20nk = 20

The preliminary pairs of nn and kk are

(1,20),(2,10),(4,5),(5,4),(10,2),(20,1)(1, 20), (2, 10), (4, 5), (5, 4), (10, 2), (20, 1)

However we must have n>kn > k so this reduces to

(5,4),(10,2),(20,1)(5, 4), (10, 2), (20, 1)

Let's try these one at a time

1 1 2 2 1--2 3 3 1--3 4 4 1--4 5 5 1--5 2--3 2--4 2--5 3--4 3--5 4--5

1 1 10 10 1--10 2 2 1--2 3 3 2--3 9 9 9--10 4 4 3--4 8 8 8--9 5 5 4--5 7 7 7--8 6 6 5--6 6--7

1 1 2 2 11 11 1--11 3 3 12 12 2--12 4 4 13 13 3--13 5 5 14 14 4--14 15 15 5--15 6 6 7 7 16 16 6--16 8 8 17 17 7--17 9 9 18 18 8--18 10 10 19 19 9--19 20 20 10--20


(16)(16) \> (+)(+) Let GG be a 33-regular graph with e(G)=2v(G)3e(G) = 2v(G) - 3. Determine the values of v(G)v(G) and e(G)e(G). Construct all such graphs GG.

Solution

nk=2m3n=2(2n3)3n=4n6n=6e(G)=2v(G)3=2n3=2×63=9nk = 2m \\ 3n = 2(2n - 3) \\ 3n = 4n - 6 \\ n = 6 \\ e(G) = 2v(G) - 3 = 2n - 3 = 2 \times 6 - 3 = 9

1 1 4 4 1--4 5 5 1--5 6 6 1--6 2 2 2--4 2--5 2--6 3 3 3--4 3--5 3--6


(17)(17) \> Find all integers nn such that 100e(Kn)200100 \leq e(K_n) \leq 200.

Solution

We know that

e(Kn)=(n2)=n!2!(n2)!=n(n1)2100n(n1)2200200n2n400e(K_n) = \binom{n}{2} = \frac{n!}{2!(n-2)!} = \frac{n(n-1)}{2} \\ 100 \leq \frac{n(n-1)}{2} \leq 200 \\ 200 \leq n^2 - n \leq 400

Let f(n)=n2nf(n) = n^2 - n. Recall that n>0n > 0, so f(n)=2n1>0f'(n) = 2n - 1 > 0 so ff is increasing. Calculate that

14×14=14×(10+4)=140+14×4=140+(10+4)×4=140+40+16=19619614=(100+96)14=100+(9614)=100+(90+6104)=100+80+64=182f(14)=14214=18215×15=5×3×5×3=25×9=25×8+25=25×4×2+25=100×2+25=22522515=200+2515=200+10=210f(15)=15215=21016×16=8×2×8×2=64×4=60×4+4×4=240+16=25625616=240f(16)=16216=24017×17=(10+7)×(10+7)=100+70+70+49=100+140+49=100+189=28928917=200+80+9107=200+8010+97=272f(17)=17217=27218×18=9×2×9×2=81×4=80×4+4=32432418=300+2418=306f(18)=18218=3061919=(10+9)×19=190+9×19=190+9×(10+9)=190+90+81=190+90+10+71=290+71=290+10+61=300+61=361191919=36119=36120+1=341+1=342f(19)=19219=34220×2020=40020=380f(20)=20220=38021×21=21×20+21=420+21=44121×2121=44121=420f(21)=21221=42014 \times 14 = 14 \times (10 + 4) = 140 + 14 \times 4 = 140 + (10 + 4) \times 4 = 140 + 40 + 16 = 196 \\ 196 - 14 = (100 + 96) - 14 = 100 + (96 - 14) = 100 + (90 + 6 - 10 - 4) \\ = 100 + 80 + 6 - 4 = 182 \\ f(14) = 14^2 - 14 = 182 \\ 15 \times 15 = 5 \times 3 \times 5 \times 3 = 25 \times 9 = 25 \times 8 + 25 \\ = 25 \times 4 \times 2 + 25 = 100 \times 2 + 25 = 225 \\ 225 - 15 = 200 + 25 - 15 = 200 + 10 = 210 \\ f(15) = 15^2 - 15 = 210 \\ 16 \times 16 = 8 \times 2 \times 8 \times 2 = 64 \times 4 = 60 \times 4 + 4 \times 4 = 240 + 16 = 256 \\ 256 - 16 = 240 \\ f(16) = 16^2 - 16 = 240 \\ 17 \times 17 = (10 + 7) \times (10 + 7) = 100 + 70 + 70 + 49 \\ = 100 + 140 + 49 = 100 + 189 = 289 \\ 289 - 17 = 200 + 80 + 9 - 10 - 7 = 200 + 80 - 10 + 9 - 7 = 272 \\ f(17) = 17^2 - 17 = 272 \\ 18 \times 18 = 9 \times 2 \times 9 \times 2 = 81 \times 4 = 80 \times 4 + 4 = 324 \\ 324 - 18 = 300 + 24 - 18 = 306 \\ f(18) = 18^2 - 18 = 306 \\ 19 * 19 = (10 + 9) \times 19 = 190 + 9 \times 19 = 190 + 9 \times (10 + 9) \\ = 190 + 90 + 81 = 190 + 90 + 10 + 71 = 290 + 71 = 290 + 10 + 61 \\ = 300 + 61 = 361 \\ 19 * 19 - 19 = 361 - 19 = 361 - 20 + 1 = 341 + 1 = 342 \\ f(19) = 19^2 - 19 = 342 \\ 20 \times 20 - 20 = 400 - 20 = 380 \\ f(20) = 20^2 - 20 = 380 \\ 21 \times 21 = 21 \times 20 + 21 = 420 + 21 = 441 \\ 21 \times 21 - 21 = 441 - 21 = 420\\ f(21) = 21 ^ 2 - 21 = 420

Why did I show all the arithmetic there? I don't know I was just having fun with it. Anyways the answer is integers nn such that

15n20.15 \leq n \leq 20. \quad \square


(18)(18) \> (+)(+) Let GG be a multigraph of order 1313 in which each vertex is of degree 77 or 88. Show that GG contains at least eight vertices of degree 77 or at least seven vertices of degree 88.

Solution

Let AA be the set of vertices degree 77 and BB be the set of vertices degree 88. Then

A+B=13,|A| + |B| = 13,

If we have

A<8|A| < 8

Then

B=13A>5|B| = 13 - |A| > 5

Our preliminary pairs are

A=7,B=6A=6,B=7A=5,B=8A=4,B=9A=3,B=10A=2,B=11A=1,B=12A=0,B=13|A| = 7, |B| = 6 \\ |A| = 6, |B| = 7 \\ |A| = 5, |B| = 8 \\ |A| = 4, |B| = 9 \\ |A| = 3, |B| = 10 \\ |A| = 2, |B| = 11 \\ |A| = 1, |B| = 12 \\ |A| = 0, |B| = 13 \\

The only case that would be problematic is

A=7,B=6|A| = 7, |B| = 6

so we just have to show that this cant happen. Using the Handshaking Lemma

7A+8B=2e(G)2e(G)=7×7+8×6=49+48=501+502=1003=977|A| + 8|B| = 2e(G) \\ 2e(G) = 7 \times 7 + 8 \times 6 = 49 + 48 = 50 - 1 + 50 - 2 = 100 - 3 = 97

This is a contradiction because 9797 is not an even number. \quad \square


(19)(19) \> (+)(+) Let GG be a graph of order nn in which there exist no three vertices uu, vv and ww such that uvuv, vwvw and wuwu are all edges in GG. Show that nδ(G)+Δ(G)n \geq \delta(G) + \Delta(G).

Solution

Let N(u)N(u) be the set of vertices incident to uu, where d(u)=Δ(G)d(u) = \Delta(G).
Let vN(u)v \in N(u). Consider N(v)N(v).
If wN(u)w \in N(u) then we don't have wN(v)w \in N(v). Since N(u)=Δ(G)|N(u)| = \Delta(G),

N(v)nΔ(G)|N(v)| \leq n - \Delta(G)

Since we obviously have

δ(G)N(v)\delta(G) \leq |N(v)|

We plug in to get

δ(G)nΔ(G)nδ(G)+Δ(G).\delta(G) \leq n - \Delta(G) \\ n \geq \delta(G) + \Delta(G). \quad \square


(20)(20) \> (+)(+) There were n(2)n \> (\geq 2) persons at a party and, as usually happens, some shake hands with others. No one shook hands with the same person more than once. Show that there are at least two persons in the party who had the same number of handshakes.

Solution
Each person is a vertex and two vertices are connected by an edge if they shook hands, so this is a graph, call it GG.
Since there are n2n \geq 2 persons, GG has order nn.
We know that for each vV(G)v \in V(G),

0d(v)n1(1)\tag{1}0 \leq d(v) \leq n - 1

Assume that there was a loner, aka someone who shook hands with no one, or in graph-theoretical terms there exists some vV(G)v \in V(G) such that

d(v)=0d(v) = 0

Since no one shook hands with vv, Inequality (1)(1) become

0d(v)n20 \leq d(v) \leq n - 2

Since there are nn vertices and n1n-1 possibilities for their degrees, by the Pigeonhole Principle at least one of the degrees must be repeated. This pair of vertices with the same degree corresponds to the people in the party with the same number of handshakes.

This solution relied on assuming that there was a loner, that is a vertex vGv \in G such that d(v)=0d(v) = 0. What if there is no loner? Well then Inequality (1)(1) becomes

0<d(v)n10 < d(v) \leq n - 1

so we can once again apply the Pigeonhole Principle to achieve the desired result. \quad \square


(21)(21) \> The preceding problem says that in any graph order n2n \geq 2, there exists two vertices having the same degree. Is the result still valid for multigraphs?

Solution

No, see this counterexample.

2 2 3 3 2--3 2--3 1 1 1--2

Vertex Degree
1 1
2 3
3 2

\square


(22)(22) \> (+)(+) Mr. and Mrs. Sany attended an exclusive party where in addition to themselves, there were only another 33 couples. As usually happens, some shake hands with others. No one shook hands with the same person more than once and no one shook hands with his/her spouse. After all the handshakes had been done, Mr. Samy asked each person, including his wife, how many hands he/she had taken. To everyone's amuesement, each one gave a different answer. How many hands did Mrs. Samy shake?


(23)(23) \> (+)(+) In the preceding problem, there were four couples altogether in a party. Solve the general problem where 'four couples' is replacy by 'n(2)n \> (\geq 2) couples'.


(24)(24) \> (+)(+) There are n2n \geq 2 distinct points in the plane such that the distance between any 22 points is at least one. Prove that there are at most 3n3n pairs of these points at distance exactly one.

\\