Let v∈V. By the definition of an additive inverse −v is the unique solution to the equation
v+(−v)=0.(1)
Similarly, −(−v) is the unique solution to the equation
(−v)+−(−v)=0.(2)
Using the commutative property on (1) we get
(−v)+v=0.
Plugging into (2) yields
−(−v)=v.□
2 Suppose a∈F, v∈V, and av=0. Prove that a=0 or v=0.
Solution
Assume that a=0. Then we divide the equation av=0 by a to get v=0.
Alternatively, assume that v=0. We know that av=0. Assume for the purpose of contradiction that a=0. Then divide by a to get v=0, a contradiction. Therefore a=0.
We have shown that a=0⟹v=0 and v=0⟹a=0. Therefore either a=0 or v=0. □
3 Suppose v,w∈V. Explain why there exists a unique x∈V such that v+3x=w.
Solution
Of course x=31(w−v) is a solution to v+3x=w. Suppose there exists x′∈V such that
v+3x′=w.
Subtracting v and dividing by 3 yields
x′=31(w−v).□
4 The empty set is not a vector space. The empty set fails to satisfy only one of the reqirements listed in the definition of a vector space (1.20). Which one?
Solution
The additive identity requires an element 0∈V, contradicting V=∅. □
5 Show that in the definition of a vector space (1.20), the additive inverse condition can be replaced with the condition that
0v=0 for all v∈V.
Here the 0 on the left side is the number 0, and the 0 on the right side is the additive identity of V.
The phrase a "condition can be replaced" in a definition means that the collection of objects satisfying the definition is unchanged if the original condition is replaced with the new condition.
Solution
Let V be a vector space. By 1.30 we know that 0v=0 for all v∈V.
Alternatively, let V satisfy all the requirements of a vector space, with the replacement of the additive inverse condition by the condition that 0v=0 for all v∈V. We need to show that V satisfies the additive inverse condition.
Let v∈V. Calculate that
v+(−1)v=1v+(−1)v=(1−1)v=0v=0.□
6 Let ∞ and −∞ denote two distinct objects, neither of which is in R. Define an addition and scalar multiplication on R∪{∞,−∞} as you could guess from the notation. Specifically, the sum and product of two real numbers is as usual, and for t∈R define
With these operations of addition and scalar multiplication, is R∪{∞,−∞} a vector space over R? Explain.
Solution
As defined above R∪{∞,−∞} does not form a vector space.
Assume for the purpose of contradiction that R∪{∞,−∞} is a vector space over R.
By the above definition we have
∞+∞=∞
Add −∞ to both sides
(∞+∞)+(−∞)=∞+(−∞)
Since ∞ and −∞ are vectors and vector addition is by definition associative,
∞+(∞+(−∞))=∞+(−∞)
it is defined above that ∞+−∞=0 so we can plug this in to get
∞+0=0,
however by the definition of an additive identity in a vector space this becomes
∞=0,
contradicting the above assertion that ∞ is a distinct object. □
7 Suppose S is a nonempty set. Let VS denote the set of functions from S to V. Define a natural addition and scalar multiplication on VS, and show that VS is a vector space with these definitions.
Solution
Let f,g,h∈VS, so f,g,h:S→V are vectors. Let λ,μ be scalars. Define vector addition and scalar multiplication as follows
(f+g)(x)=f(x)+g(x),(λf)(x)=λf(x).
We proceed to verify the vector space axioms. Let x∈S.